More About Expatriation Act
House of Representatives Bill 3166 and Senate Bill 1698 (more commonly known as HR 3166 and S.
1698 respectively) are more commonly termed as the Expatriation Act (or Enemy Expatriation Act).
It was proposed and introduced on October 12, 2011 in the 112th session of Congress by Representatives Jason Altmire (D-PA) and Charlie Dent (R-PA) and Senators Scott Brown (R-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT).
The bill allows the Federal Government to strip any US citizen of their citizenship status if they are found guilty of participating in terrorism or any terrorist activities.
To this date, the bill has not yet passed for reasons unknown.
However, a number of political analysts have speculated that it has been closely compared to the National Defense Authorization Act Some opponents to the bill contend that this act could be used in conjunction with the Expatriation Act to strip an individual of their civil liberties.
The Expatriation Act was born out of the response to terrorist acts and the war on terrorism here in the US.
However, it's opponents have cynically referred to the act as a "war on personal liberties.
" The opponents to the act also contend that it would create a scenario similar to that described in George Orwell's book "1984" or "big brother is watching you" all the time.
But is this act really a kneejerk reaction by political zealots or one that is truly meant to protect the safety of the US and its millions of legal citizens? The National Defense Authorization Act was inked into law by President Obama on New Year's Eve of 2011.
At the press conference held during the signing, the President assured all citizens of the US that the law was not being enacted to strip them of their civil liberties and rights.
According to the opponents of the Expatriation Act, the passage of the act could change everything covered in the National Defense Authorization Act.
The intent of the Expatriation Act is to strip any US citizen of their citizenship should they be accused and found guilty of engaging in or supporting any hostilities against the country.
According to the text of this legislation, "Hostilities" in this case is defined as "any conflict subject to the laws of war.
" However, the act does not explicitly specify that these charges will be taken into a court of law.
At least for the time being, US citizens have the National Defense Authorization Act to rely on.
If you have problems or issues dealing with immigration or citizenship issues, it si bets to consult a good immigration lawyer.
Most of them have handled cases pertaining to citizenship, visas and immigration problems and can help accordingly.
With years of experience with such issues, seeking the advice and discussing your case can be of help.
They will be able to guide you better and ensure that the immigration or citizenship issues are resolved amicability.
You can ask for references before selecting the lawyer who will represent you in your specific case.
1698 respectively) are more commonly termed as the Expatriation Act (or Enemy Expatriation Act).
It was proposed and introduced on October 12, 2011 in the 112th session of Congress by Representatives Jason Altmire (D-PA) and Charlie Dent (R-PA) and Senators Scott Brown (R-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT).
The bill allows the Federal Government to strip any US citizen of their citizenship status if they are found guilty of participating in terrorism or any terrorist activities.
To this date, the bill has not yet passed for reasons unknown.
However, a number of political analysts have speculated that it has been closely compared to the National Defense Authorization Act Some opponents to the bill contend that this act could be used in conjunction with the Expatriation Act to strip an individual of their civil liberties.
The Expatriation Act was born out of the response to terrorist acts and the war on terrorism here in the US.
However, it's opponents have cynically referred to the act as a "war on personal liberties.
" The opponents to the act also contend that it would create a scenario similar to that described in George Orwell's book "1984" or "big brother is watching you" all the time.
But is this act really a kneejerk reaction by political zealots or one that is truly meant to protect the safety of the US and its millions of legal citizens? The National Defense Authorization Act was inked into law by President Obama on New Year's Eve of 2011.
At the press conference held during the signing, the President assured all citizens of the US that the law was not being enacted to strip them of their civil liberties and rights.
According to the opponents of the Expatriation Act, the passage of the act could change everything covered in the National Defense Authorization Act.
The intent of the Expatriation Act is to strip any US citizen of their citizenship should they be accused and found guilty of engaging in or supporting any hostilities against the country.
According to the text of this legislation, "Hostilities" in this case is defined as "any conflict subject to the laws of war.
" However, the act does not explicitly specify that these charges will be taken into a court of law.
At least for the time being, US citizens have the National Defense Authorization Act to rely on.
If you have problems or issues dealing with immigration or citizenship issues, it si bets to consult a good immigration lawyer.
Most of them have handled cases pertaining to citizenship, visas and immigration problems and can help accordingly.
With years of experience with such issues, seeking the advice and discussing your case can be of help.
They will be able to guide you better and ensure that the immigration or citizenship issues are resolved amicability.
You can ask for references before selecting the lawyer who will represent you in your specific case.
Source...