When Is It Okay to Lie About the Environment, Anytime You Are Promoting Global Warming Theory
Well, as you probably know I run a think tank, and I've been quite upset with some of the alternative energy schemes which are far too costly for the generation of energy, as they have a lousy return on investment, and they really are not reliable energy it all.
Let's take wind turbine generation for instance.
Did you know it takes CO2 to make the concrete, and the amount of concrete in the base of one of those large wind turbines takes almost 10-15 years depending on how strong the wind in the area is to even offset the carbon created in the making of that concrete? It's true.
Did you also know that before Nixon signed the "Federal Clean Water Act," in 1972 that there was a small oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara CA, actually it was between Santa Barbara CA and Ventura CA, and did you know that 163 birds died because they had oil on them? Did you know the environmentalists ran out there with their cameras, and blew the whole event at of proportion? That's also true.
But did you know that these wind turbines are killing birds every single day, thousands of them actually.
But apparently, that's okay because wind energy is considered clean energy, and alternative energy is good - good for whom or what? Well, that sure sounds great, but wind power is unreliable because sometimes the wind doesn't blow.
Therefore it doesn't solve the challenges we have, as we are in an industrialized nation and we need the power.
We need more power not less.
Why is it okay to lie about the environment, and attack one source of energy with lawsuits, over regulation, and increased taxes - and then take that tax money, and add to it much more and call it an investment in America while we use those monies to fund unreliable energy? It makes no sense to me, but I hope you can shoot me an e-mail and explain it to me.
I'd also like to make another point.
It seems that as long as we are talking about global warming, which is a theory, and has not been proven, nor is there a consensus in the scientific community despite what Al Gore et al would have you believe - that it's suddenly okay for academia and the powers that be to lie.
It is not okay to promote false data, or to scare the living daylights out of the American people.
Living a lie is not what America is about, that's not honorable.
You see, it's time to tell the truth, and do what's right for the right reasons.
If we want less air pollution, then we should be funding clean coal technologies and research.
We shouldn't be spending money on subsidizing unreliable and unprofitable energy schemes.
Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.
Let's take wind turbine generation for instance.
Did you know it takes CO2 to make the concrete, and the amount of concrete in the base of one of those large wind turbines takes almost 10-15 years depending on how strong the wind in the area is to even offset the carbon created in the making of that concrete? It's true.
Did you also know that before Nixon signed the "Federal Clean Water Act," in 1972 that there was a small oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara CA, actually it was between Santa Barbara CA and Ventura CA, and did you know that 163 birds died because they had oil on them? Did you know the environmentalists ran out there with their cameras, and blew the whole event at of proportion? That's also true.
But did you know that these wind turbines are killing birds every single day, thousands of them actually.
But apparently, that's okay because wind energy is considered clean energy, and alternative energy is good - good for whom or what? Well, that sure sounds great, but wind power is unreliable because sometimes the wind doesn't blow.
Therefore it doesn't solve the challenges we have, as we are in an industrialized nation and we need the power.
We need more power not less.
Why is it okay to lie about the environment, and attack one source of energy with lawsuits, over regulation, and increased taxes - and then take that tax money, and add to it much more and call it an investment in America while we use those monies to fund unreliable energy? It makes no sense to me, but I hope you can shoot me an e-mail and explain it to me.
I'd also like to make another point.
It seems that as long as we are talking about global warming, which is a theory, and has not been proven, nor is there a consensus in the scientific community despite what Al Gore et al would have you believe - that it's suddenly okay for academia and the powers that be to lie.
It is not okay to promote false data, or to scare the living daylights out of the American people.
Living a lie is not what America is about, that's not honorable.
You see, it's time to tell the truth, and do what's right for the right reasons.
If we want less air pollution, then we should be funding clean coal technologies and research.
We shouldn't be spending money on subsidizing unreliable and unprofitable energy schemes.
Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.
Source...