We sure hear a lot about climate change and how global warming due to mankind CO2 emissions are causing the average ambient surface temperatures of Earth to go up rapidly, melt ice, and kill off species.
The reality is that the overall average temperatures of the earth's surface are only expected to go up a few degrees Fahrenheit between now and the year 2100 which will most likely help the species of the planet, it's really the ice ages we ought to be concerned with.
Likewise, we are told the coastlines will flood out everywhere, not so, you see the ocean sea level is only expected to rise about 1 1/2 feet by 2100.
Basically, there's nothing to be alarmed at, nor should we consider CO2 which is only a trace gas to be evil.
Carbon and oxygen are abundant on this planet, obviously they will combine.
Humans are partly made of carbon and without oxygen we couldn't exist either in this form.
If people are really worried about mankind's endeavors and how they are increasing the temperature or even causing more severe weather patterns, then they should be looking at urban heat islands as one of the bigger challenges, not necessarily CO2 or other greenhouse emissions.
Now then, let's talk about the increase in average ambient temperature over America's cities.
Due to all the concrete and asphalt heating up in these areas the temperature can be anywhere from 5 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit hotter.
That's quite a bit actually, and although it is confined to only those city areas, the average ambient surface temperature in the suburbs has also been increasing.
Together, these warmer landmasses areas heat up the cooler air from the trade winds and normal airflow currents.
We also know when cold air mixes with warmer air we get turbulence, and if some of that air has moisture in it we get incredible thunderstorms, torrential rains, and often the mixing of the two can cause things like tornadoes - when these things happen as the air flows over the city and continues on we should be attributing this to mankind's environmental changes.
Yes, there is some pollution in the urban areas as well, but the heat and potential temperature inversions also can cause quite a problem.
One thing that hasn't been studied too much and I wish I could read more research papers on it, is the fact that electronic frequency pollution is also abundant in the city, the vibrational energy from all of those air molecules being bombarded and bouncing around due to all of that electronic equipment and energy in the air.
This causes the air molecules to realign themselves, and it makes the air thicker.
Thicker air also changes the normal wind patterns to a large degree and messes with our climate models, not to mention our artificially intelligent supercomputer weather prediction systems.
Interestingly enough, the FCC has granted nearly all of the frequencies available in our communication spectrum to various operators.
That's a lot of white noise, background noise, and frequency pollution aligning air molecules and the gaseous pollution molecular compounds.
Isn't it about time that we study this? If we are to blame mankind for changes in the weather, shouldn't we look at some of the other things mankind is doing, rather than trying to blame it all on fossil fuels and CO2? After all, mankind only puts out about 4% of the CO2 in the atmosphere, the other 96% comes from natural causes, and again, CO2 is merely a trace gas anyway.
Indeed I hope you will please consider all this, and be fearless in challenging the climate scientists, academic experts, and those that claim that mankind's emissions of greenhouse gases are the cause of extreme weather, or average ambient surface temperature increases.
Think on it.