It's not easy for most guys to seduce women because they don't understand them.
That's because more often than not, men take women at face value: if you ask them what they're looking for in a man, they'll say "a nice guy" and yet you'll nearly always strike out anyway despite (apparently) being exactly what they say they want.
And interestingly enough, the same women will date perhaps "not so nice guys" while proclaiming that "men are pigs!" What gives? Crafty politicians and other marketing experts have long known that if you repeat a statement often enough, in time people will begin to assume that the statement must be true.
And one claim that's been repeated for as many years as we can remember is that "men are pigs".
As hackneyed clichés go, it's one of the oldest.
But as sound bites go, it's crisp.
It's catchy.
And it's often assumed to be true.
And while this particular insult (about us being pigs) has been used to cover anything from not being tidy enough around the house to breaking wind in public, it usually refers to the male sex drive: men are too horny, too urgent, and too pushy (apparently).
Men try to minimize the time it will take between meeting and mating with a woman they've just met.
They have a "one-track mind.
" They think with their "little head.
" Or so the prevailing wisdom says.
We don't buy it.
Men are whatever way we were designed to be, in the same way that women are whatever way they're designed to be.
Neither design is inherently evil ...
we're just different from each other.
Who's to say whether it's men who are too horny ...
or women who are too frigid? The fact of the matter is that women are also highly sexual beings under the right circumstances.
However, they've learned they can get more from men (while also doing less in return) if they feign disgust at male sexuality.
Consider, for example, that the women who complain about how men keep coming on to them are usually also the women who dress the most overtly in a clear effort to attract that male attention.
Coincidence? We think not.
We've seen countless women strutting past construction sites while wearing a short skirt and low-cut top (and who then expressed outrage that this drew wolf whistles and possibly even "offensive" gestures).
But we've seen very few women who aren't dressed to solicit attention who then receive unwanted male attention anyway.
Can you see a pattern here? Women go to great lengths to solicit male attention, but then feign outrage when they get it.
In fact, the only thing that seems to upset women more is when other women dress to attract male attention and those other women then get more male attention than they do.
But it also reveals that most women use the "shotgun" approach when it comes to attracting men.
They walk down the street dressed to attract every male below the age of 115 within a 200-yard radius.
However, the law of averages says most of those males will be less of a catch than she hopes for.
And so when one of those "lesser males" take the bait and approaches her, she'll become indignant and take him to task for being "a pig.
" His crime here was not the fact he approached her, nor was it even the way in which he approached her.
It was more the fact that he just didn't happen to be the latest hunky Hollywood star or a "man of financial means".
But couldn't women use the "rifle" approach instead of the "shotgun" approach? Why not dress conservatively, so that hordes of the "wrong" guys don't try to hit on her? That way she could then come on strong only to men with whom she really wanted to be with.
This would solve the problem nicely -- if it's truly a problem for women to be hit on by lots of guys.
But it really isn't: women were designed to crave male attention.
So don't let women trick you into feeling guilty for taking the bait.
You can in fact remain a nice guy and seduce women successfully by remembering you're not the guilty party when it comes to sexual attraction.