An unaccountable and self-managed legal community will necessarily evolve for its own benefit, behaviors, rules, and judgments that abridge our constitutional principles.
Lord Acton's phrase, "power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely" is ever in operation, and no place more effectively than through the legal scam that is destroying fathers, families, and freedom in our Family Courts.
Here's why...
As much as hundreds of thousands of dollars is robbed from an average fit father as a result of divorce and paternity suits in family courts based on denying fit fathers their parental rights to their children and all that it implies such as authority, nurture, and direct support of them.
This denial in turn rests on the legal misuse of 'best interest of child standard' that originally allowed courts to decide custody issues when both parents were either unfit or dead.
Now, for political and monetary gain, this operationally vague standard is used to rip a fit father from his children.
It's important to recognize that the divorce system targets the fit father rather than the fit mother for denial of parental rights because if fit mothers and fathers were denied their parental rights more or less equally, society would reject this court tyranny immediately.
Denying overwhelmingly only fit fathers their right to parent (i.
e.
physical custody) allows our system of feminist jurisprudence to count on an avid support from most women to justify this constitutional denial along with the further fundamental rights denials of a fit father that immediately ensue to serve the court's determination of his child's 'best interests'.
Father-vilifying propaganda, a general cover-up of the true state of affairs that fathers face, and the profit and control that mothers and the rest of the divorce and domestic violence industry (DDVI) can count on from a father's income, assets, and his 'being' makes this scam enormously successful.
Once you unconstitutionally deny one fundamental right of a fit father - i.
e.
the right to parent his children- it isn't difficult for a family court judge to go on to deny other of his fundamental rights to serve the judge's determinations for what shall be the 'best interests of the father's child' and, of course, the child's mother interests too.
By these other rights, I mean his right to determine the use of his property and income, aside from taxes as is the case for every citizen, to choose any lawful profession in which to employ himself, to his freedom to go where he wishes - even leave the country - and, naturally, to count on constitutional due process in the courts.
The state demands that the father's job (his responsibility) is simply to supply the money that the state demands of him for benefits that the state deems right.
It is a clear case of extortion that the judges impose; they put a father in a slave position.
It is upon fathers' backs that this system of tyranny against fathers survives and grows with the concomitant destruction of his family, his children, and his freedom.
(It's time for 'Atlas' to 'Shrug' them off.
) The feminist faction of this legal tyranny with its profits and government entwined power is able to force onto society its unnatural matriarchal social engineering agenda while financially and legally crippling the very fathers who would expose this tyranny.
Indeed, those fathers that do work to expose this system are singled out to the family court judges for special consideration.
As a result, lawyers often warn fathers to stay away from fathers rights groups during divorce proceedings.
This tyranny and the profits that it breeds, illegally abridge the separation of governmental branches designed as part of the checks and balances called for in our constitution to prevent the type of over-reaching of government power now in effect for more profits, power, and accommodation to the tyranny.
But it must be recognized for what it is before it can be stopped.